Subscribe to continue reading
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
Editorial: The Main Street Curse
Tag / News
Editorial: Santa Ana’s Homelessness Crisis Demands Urgent, Compassionate Action
According to the most recent Orange County Point-in-Time (PIT) Count data, the number of people experiencing homelessness in Santa Ana rose from 1,298 in 2023 to 1,520 in 2024—an increase of approximately 17% in just one year. Countywide, the numbers tell a similarly troubling story: homelessness grew from 7,392 to 8,299 individuals over the same period.
These figures are more than statistics—they represent human beings living without the basic dignity of safe, stable shelter. The PIT Count, conducted each January by the Orange County Continuum of Care in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines, offers only a snapshot of a complex and evolving crisis. Yet even this conservative estimate underscores a clear and worsening trend.
Santa Ana, as Orange County’s second-largest city and a historic hub of community and culture, faces mounting pressure to respond with both urgency and empathy. While local officials have taken steps—such as expanding shelter capacity, launching outreach teams, and investing in affordable housing—the scale of need continues to outpace available resources.
The root causes of homelessness are multifaceted: soaring housing costs, stagnant wages, mental health challenges, and systemic inequities. No single policy or program can solve them alone. What’s needed is a coordinated, sustained effort that combines immediate humanitarian support with long-term structural solutions—rental assistance, supportive housing, behavioral health services, and prevention strategies that keep people from falling into homelessness in the first place.
As the 2025 PIT Count approaches, the community must ask: Will we accept a future where more of our neighbors sleep on sidewalks and in parks? Or will we choose bold, compassionate action that affirms the value of every resident?
The data is clear. The time to act is now.
Editorial: Safety on the Santa Ana River Trail — A Community Concern
Over the past three months, a troubling pattern has emerged along the Santa Ana River Trail. As of last night—July 10, 2025—there have been multiple shootings near the 17th Street Bridge in Santa Ana, raising serious concerns about public safety on one of the city’s most popular recreational paths.
The Santa Ana River Trail is more than just a bike path—it’s a vital artery for commuters, fitness enthusiasts, and families looking to enjoy a peaceful stretch of nature within an urban environment. But with recent incidents concentrated in the evening hours, many residents are asking: How safe is it really to use the trail after dark?
A Pattern of Violence
While crime can occur anywhere, the frequency of shootings near the 17th St. Bridge over the past 90 days suggests a troubling hotspot. These incidents not only endanger those using the trail but also cast a shadow over the sense of security that should accompany outdoor recreation.
Most of the crimes reported occurred during twilight or nighttime hours, prompting understandable concern among joggers, cyclists, and pedestrians who rely on the trail for exercise and transportation. The question now isn’t just whether these crimes are isolated events—but whether they signal a broader issue that demands immediate attention.
Where Is Law Enforcement?
Many residents are also questioning the presence and effectiveness of patrols by the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) along the river trail within city limits. While SAPD does conduct regular patrols in the area, the recent spate of violence raises concerns about whether current efforts are sufficient to deter criminal activity.
We urge SAPD to provide transparency regarding their patrol schedules and strategies for securing this critical public space. Increased visibility—particularly during high-risk hours—could go a long way toward restoring community confidence and preventing further incidents.
Additionally, coordination with neighboring agencies such as the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and Anaheim PD may be necessary, as the river trail spans multiple jurisdictions. A unified approach could enhance safety and ensure consistent enforcement across the entire corridor.
What Can Be Done?
Community engagement must also play a role in improving safety. Encouraging trail users to report suspicious behavior, increasing lighting in high-traffic areas, and installing emergency call boxes near known trouble spots could make a meaningful difference.
Local advocacy groups, neighborhood associations, and city officials should come together to evaluate the situation and develop a comprehensive safety plan. This includes not only law enforcement measures but also outreach to at-risk youth and support for community-based interventions that address the root causes of violence.
Final Thoughts
The Santa Ana River Trail should be a place of connection, wellness, and community—not fear. While we acknowledge the challenges law enforcement faces in maintaining safety across a sprawling city, the recent shootings demand a stronger, more visible response.
Residents deserve to walk, bike, and commute safely. City leaders and police officials must act swiftly to ensure that the trail remains a source of pride and enjoyment, not anxiety and danger.
It’s time for action—for accountability, for awareness, and above all, for safety.
Call to Action:
We encourage all concerned residents to attend the next Santa Ana City Council meeting and voice their concerns. We also urge the SAPD to issue a public statement outlining their plans for enhancing safety on the Santa Ana River Trail.
Editorial: Crisis de liderazgo de la alcaldesa de Santa Ana, Valerie Amezcua, y complicidad del Departamento de Policía de Santa Ana y los imitadores de ICE (cazadores de recompensas).
Las calles de Santa Ana se han convertido en un campo de batalla por los derechos humanos fundamentales, donde los residentes viven con miedo, no de los delincuentes, sino de los cazarrecompensas armados que operan con alarmante impunidad. El silencio de la alcaldesa Valerie Amezcua y la complicidad del Departamento de Policía de Santa Ana (SAPD) al permitir estos secuestros violentos no solo es preocupante, sino también inaceptable.
El martes 1 de julio de 2025, surgieron múltiples informes de secuestros descarados llevados a cabo por cazarrecompensas en Main St., Warner Ave. y Edinger Ave. Los testigos describieron escenas que serían más propias de una zona de guerra que de una ciudad de EE. UU.: individuos armados agarrando a la gente en la calle, apuntando rifles de asalto, incluidas armas tipo AK-47, a civiles aterrorizados y desapareciendo con sus víctimas mientras las fuerzas del orden se quedaban de brazos cruzados sin hacer nada.
Reflexionen sobre esto: la policía no respondió. A plena luz del día, frente a agentes del Departamento de Policía de San Diego (SAPD), cazarrecompensas —agentes privados sin autoridad legal— cometieron secuestros e intimidación. Esto no es justicia. Esto no es seguridad. Es una abdicación del deber por parte de quienes juraron proteger al público.
La alcaldesa Valerie Amezcua no ha hecho declaraciones públicas, ni ha dado conferencias de prensa, ni ha reconocido la creciente crisis. ¿Dónde está su voz? ¿Dónde está su liderazgo? Si la alcaldesa no puede, o no quiere, defender la seguridad y la dignidad de los residentes de Santa Ana, no tiene derecho a dirigir esta ciudad.
Los cazarrecompensas no son agentes del orden. No operan bajo los mismos estándares de supervisión, entrenamiento ni rendición de cuentas. Sin embargo, aquí en Santa Ana, actúan como si llevaran placas: amenazan, detienen e incluso secuestran a personas sin consecuencias. Y el Departamento de Policía de Santa Ana (SAPD), en lugar de intervenir para detener estos delitos, parece estar protegiéndolos.
Esto plantea serias preguntas: ¿Qué tipo de relación existe entre el SAPD y estos cazarrecompensas? ¿Estamos presenciando una colusión? ¿Existe un acuerdo informal que permite a actores corruptos imponer su propia justicia mientras se ignora la verdadera?
Los residentes de Santa Ana merecen algo mejor. Merecen un alcalde que los proteja, no que los ponga en riesgo. Merecen un departamento de policía que sirva y proteja, no que permita la violencia y las desapariciones.
Si la alcaldesa Amezcua sigue guardando silencio mientras los cazarrecompensas aterrorizan nuestros barrios, entonces sí, debería ser destituida. Su inacción no es neutral; es peligrosa. Envía el mensaje de que algunas vidas no importan, que la violencia es tolerable y que la rendición de cuentas es opcional.
Y al SAPD: su juramento fue proteger al pueblo. Al cruzarse de brazos y permitir que hombres armados secuestraran ciudadanos en la calle, rompieron ese juramento.
Exigimos al alcalde Amezcua que se dirija de inmediato al público, emita una postura clara contra estos secuestros ilegales y exija transparencia al Departamento de Policía de Santa Ana (SAPD). Exigimos una investigación independiente sobre los sucesos del 1 de julio y el patrón general de actividad de cazarrecompensas en nuestra ciudad.
Ya basta. Los residentes de Santa Ana no deberían vivir con el temor de ser secuestrados por desconocidos armados mientras nuestros líderes hacen la vista gorda. Si no exigimos responsabilidades a nuestros funcionarios ahora, corremos el riesgo de perder la poca confianza que queda en nuestras instituciones y de poner vidas en mayor riesgo.
Es hora de actuar. Es hora de hacer justicia. Es hora de proteger a Santa Ana.
Editorial: A Crisis of Leadership of Santa Ana Mayor Valerie Amezcua and Complicity of The Santa Ana Police Department and The ICE Impersonators (Bounty Hunters).
The streets of Santa Ana have become a battleground for basic human rights, where residents live in fear—not from criminals, but from armed bounty hunters operating with alarming impunity. The silence from Mayor Valerie Amezcua and the complicity of the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) in allowing these violent kidnappings to occur is not just troubling—it is unacceptable.
On Tuesday, July 1st, 2025, multiple reports emerged of brazen kidnappings carried out by bounty hunters on Main St., Warner Ave., and Edinger Ave. Witnesses described scenes that would be more fitting for a war zone than a U.S. city: armed individuals grabbing people off the street, pointing assault rifles—including AK-47-style weapons—at terrified civilians, and disappearing with their victims while law enforcement stood by and did nothing.
Let that sink in: the police did not respond. In broad daylight, in front of SAPD officers, bounty hunters—private actors with no legal authority—committed acts of kidnapping and intimidation. This is not justice. This is not safety. This is an abdication of duty by those sworn to protect the public.
Mayor Valerie Amezcua has offered no public statement, no press conference, no acknowledgment of this escalating crisis. Where is her voice? Where is her leadership? If the mayor cannot—or will not—stand up for the safety and dignity of Santa Ana’s residents, she has no business leading this city.
Bounty hunters are not law enforcement. They do not operate under the same oversight, training, or accountability standards. Yet here in Santa Ana, they act as if they wear badges—threatening, detaining, and even kidnapping individuals without consequence. And the SAPD, rather than intervening to stop these crimes, appears to be shielding them.
This raises serious questions: What kind of relationship exists between the SAPD and these bounty hunters? Are we witnessing collusion? Is there an informal agreement allowing rogue actors to enforce their own brand of “justice” while real justice is ignored?
Santa Ana residents deserve better. They deserve a mayor who protects them, not puts them at risk. They deserve a police department that serves and protects—not enables violence and disappearances.
If Mayor Amezcua continues to remain silent while bounty hunters terrorize our neighborhoods, then yes—she should be recalled. Her inaction is not neutral; it is dangerous. It sends a message that some lives don’t matter, that violence is tolerable, and that accountability is optional.
And to the SAPD: your oath was to protect the people. When you stood by and allowed armed men to kidnap citizens in the street, you broke that oath.
We call on Mayor Amezcua to immediately address the public, issue a clear stance against these unlawful kidnappings, and demand transparency from the SAPD. We call for an independent investigation into the events of July 1st and the broader pattern of bounty hunters activity in our city.
Enough is enough. Santa Ana residents should not live in fear of being kidnapped by armed strangers while our leaders look the other way. If we do not hold our officials accountable now, we risk losing what little trust remains in our institutions—and putting lives at even greater risk.
It’s time for action. It’s time for justice. It’s time to protect Santa Ana.
Editorial: A Call for Accountability — Why Hasn’t Mayor Valerie Amezcua Taken Action Against Unverified “Federal Agents” Operating in Santa Ana?
Failing to Protect The Residents of Santa Ana.
The people of Santa Ana deserve transparency, protection, and due process under the law. Yet, disturbing reports continue to surface regarding unidentified individuals—often masked and claiming to be federal agents—who are allegedly involved in unlawful detentions and even kidnappings in public view. These actions, reportedly occurring in the presence of Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) officers who fail to intervene or verify the identities of these individuals, raise urgent questions about both legal responsibility and public safety.
Under California’s Penal Code 832, peace officers are required to act with due diligence in the performance of their duties. When SAPD officers witness what appears to be illegal acts—including kidnapping—and do not intervene or attempt to identify those responsible, they may indeed be complicit under the law. By failing to verify credentials, request identification, or at least investigate such incidents, SAPD officers risk becoming accessories to crimes committed in their presence.
Furthermore, every sworn law enforcement officer has taken an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and protect citizens from unlawful government intrusion. When officers stand by as individuals—whether legitimate federal agents or not—engage in warrantless detentions or abductions, they are violating the very principles they swore to defend.
Mayor Valerie Amezcua, as the head of the city’s executive branch and a representative of the people, must address this alarming situation immediately. The City Council and local oversight bodies also have a duty to ensure that SAPD is fulfilling its mandate to serve and protect all residents of Santa Ana—not turning a blind eye to potential criminal activity, no matter the alleged affiliation of the perpetrators.
We call on Mayor Amezcua and SAPD leadership to:
- Issue clear directives for officers to verify the identity and agency affiliation of any individual claiming to be a federal agent before allowing them to conduct operations within the city.
- Investigate all reported incidents involving unverified individuals engaging in detentions or arrests.
- Provide transparency to the public regarding any coordination or communication with federal agencies operating locally.
- Hold accountable any officers who fail to perform their sworn duty to protect citizens from unlawful harm or coercion.
The Constitution does not permit selective enforcement of the law. If our local law enforcement will not uphold it—especially when others abuse their perceived authority—they become part of the problem rather than the solution.
Santa Ana deserves better. Our community deserves safety, clarity, and justice—not silence or complicity.
Editorial: Orange County Law Enforcement Must Verify the Identities of Alleged Federal Agents
Disturbing accounts and video evidence have surfaced in recent months indicating that purported federal officials have been carrying out arrests and detentions in Orange County—and even Los Angeles County—without any obvious identification, credentials, or verifiable authority. These occurrences, which frequently involve unmarked cars, plainclothes persons, and ambiguous assertions of federal affiliation, give cause for significant worry about public safety, civil rights, and the rule of law.
Before assisting or cooperating with anyone who claims to be a federal agent in any arrest or detention, it’s time for Orange County’s local law enforcement agencies to take quick action by confirming the identities and qualifications of those people. Not doing so not only endangers the populace but might also implicate local police in unlawful activities, such as kidnapping, which is a crime under California Penal Code.
The Issue
Unidentified people are now seen in several videos circulating online, occasionally accompanied by local police, detaining or arresting people without clearly identifying their agency, showing badges, or outlining the legal justification for the arrest. The fact that these people sometimes seem to act without transparency or accountability raises the alarming possibility that they are not actual federal agents but rather bounty hunters, private security officers, or, worse, imposters taking advantage of the public’s confidence in law enforcement.
In Santa Ana, for example, local police were seen aiding in an arrest made by suspected federal agents whose identities have not been established. In Los Angeles County, a startling video showed LAPD officers standing by and defending alleged Federal Agents who forcefully abducted someone from the street. This action may be considered kidnapping under California law if carried out without legal authorization.
What the law says
Kidnapping is defined in California law, particularly in Penal Code § 207, as transporting someone against their will, by force or fear, and without any legal cause. Unless “federal agents” are acting within the confines of legal authority, the law makes no provision for them. A person may be unlawfully deprived of their freedom if they are detained or arrested by someone who claims to have federal status but has no verified credentials, and anybody who helps in such an arrest may face criminal charges.
In particular, local police officers who have been certified by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) are trained to protect constitutional rights and enforce state laws. This includes making sure that every arrest is legal and made by someone with the authority to do so. Officers violate both their training and their sworn duty when they fail to confirm the validity of those making arrests, particularly when federal affiliation is asserted.
Where Are Our Local Leaders?
The silence of district attorneys, city council members, and Orange County supervisors is deafening. These authorities are in charge of supervising law enforcement procedures and guaranteeing the safety of citizens’ civil rights. However, local agencies have not been given any explicit instruction from the government requiring them to confirm the identities of federal officers.
We ask that the heads of the county and the city come out and give unambiguous directives to every law enforcement agency in the area:
1. Verify Credentials: Before aiding in an arrest or detention, an officer must ascertain the identity, agency connection, and official status of anybody claiming to be a federal agent.
2. Demand Transparency: Officers must demand that any federal officer involved in an arrest produce legitimate identification, justify the basis for the arrest, and produce evidence of authority.
3. Report Suspicious Activity: Any suspected impersonation of a federal agent should be reported right away to the appropriate oversight organizations, such as the California Attorney General’s Office and the FBI.
4. Educate officers accordingly: Local departments must revise procedures and train officers on how to deal with encounters with unidentified federal officers, stressing the significance of adhering to state law and protecting citizens from illegal imprisonment.
Demanding Accountability
It establishes a hazardous precedent for local law enforcement to continue to stand by while unverified agents take people into custody. We cannot let our streets turn into a Wild West where anybody may assert federal power and pull people away with impunity.
This is not about defying federal law enforcement; it’s about making sure that those who assert such authority are real, responsible, and abiding by the law. Residents deserve more than misunderstanding, terror, and the risk of being held unlawfully. They deserve transparency, due process, and the assurance that their local police are protecting them — not enabling would-be criminals who are hiding behind badges they don’t possess.
Orange County needs to set an example for the rest of the state. Law enforcement should no longer aid in arrests made by unverified individuals. And our elected officials must take action right away to safeguard the rights and security of every resident.
Enough is enough.
Editorial: Justice or Injustice? The Santa Ana Police Brutality Incident Raises Serious Concerns
In a scene that has now gone viral, the streets of Santa Ana turned into a battleground between law enforcement and concerned citizens — and the troubling footage raises serious questions about police conduct, accountability, and the misuse of power.
What began as an encounter with a visibly intoxicated man quickly escalated into chaos when Santa Ana police agents were captured on video using excessive force against the individual. The footage shows one agent pushing a woman to the ground and the same police agent is seeing again repeatedly striking the male victim with a baton. Witnesses, including several bystanders who attempted to de-escalate the situation or defend the vulnerable, were met with arrests rather than appreciation.
The most disturbing aspect of this case is the reversal of roles being played by authorities. Instead of investigating potential misconduct by their own agents, the Santa Ana Police Department appears to be doubling down, backing claims that the officers were “assaulted” by civilians. And shockingly, District Attorney Spitzer has charged those who tried to intervene — the so-called “good Samaritans” — with crimes, while the agents involved remain on active duty without public disciplinary action.
This sends a dangerous message: that protecting the public from police abuse may itself be criminalized. Where is the justice for the man beaten on the pavement? Where is the protection for the woman shoved to the ground? And where is the outrage over the apparent shielding of law enforcement at the expense of truth and fairness?
Communities deserve to feel safe — not just from crime, but from the very people sworn to protect them. When police brutality occurs and the response is to silence witnesses and criminalize concern, it erodes trust in every level of the justice system.
We call on local officials, civil rights organizations, and the community at large to demand a full and transparent investigation into this incident. The agents involved must be held accountable if the evidence supports it, and the charges against the bystanders should be dropped unless there is clear proof of wrongdoing beyond intervening in what appeared to be a violent and unprovoked attack.
This is not about choosing sides — it’s about upholding justice. If we allow police violence to be justified under the guise of authority, then no one is safe. It’s time for real reform, real oversight, and real consequences.
Enough is enough. The badge should never be a shield for brutality.
Editorial: El silencio de la alcaldesa de Santa Ana, Valerie Amezcua, ante el peligro — ¿Dónde está el liderazgo en Santa Ana?
Ha surgido un video inquietante que muestra a hombres armados no identificados, que dicen ser agentes de ICE, apuntando con un arma a una persona que documentaba sus acciones durante lo que parecía ser un arresto migratorio en Santa Ana. Esto no es solo una violación de las libertades civiles, sino una peligrosa escalada que pone vidas en riesgo y erosiona la confianza pública en las fuerzas del orden.
Las imágenes plantean preguntas urgentes: ¿Quiénes son estos individuos? ¿Por qué se les permitió operar sin una identificación clara ni supervisión? Y, quizás lo más importante, ¿dónde estaban las autoridades locales?
En una ciudad donde la seguridad y los derechos de todos los residentes deben ser primordiales, la ausencia de una respuesta rápida y contundente por parte de los líderes locales es alarmante. La alcaldesa Valerie Amezcua y otros funcionarios municipales han guardado silencio en gran medida tras este incidente, a pesar de las graves implicaciones para la seguridad y la rendición de cuentas de la comunidad. El Departamento de Policía de Santa Ana, que desde hace tiempo se ha posicionado como un defensor de la confianza pública, debe responder por qué ningún agente intervino o siquiera respondió a lo que podría haber sido un enfrentamiento mortal.
Cuando individuos armados, ya sean agentes federales o no, operan en nuestros barrios con poca transparencia o supervisión, el potencial de violencia aumenta exponencialmente. Esto es especialmente cierto cuando estos individuos parecen actuar con impunidad, intimidando a civiles que simplemente intentan observar y documentar actividades legales (o ilegales). Esto no solo es imprudente, sino que constituye una amenaza para la democracia.
Si bien el ICE tiene el mandato de hacer cumplir las leyes federales de inmigración, dicha autoridad debe ejercerse dentro de los límites legales y éticos. No hay justificación para blandir un arma de fuego contra alguien que ejerce su derecho a grabar a funcionarios públicos en espacios públicos. Si efectivamente se trataba de agentes del ICE, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional debe iniciar una investigación inmediata. De no ser así, ¿quiénes eran exactamente? ¿Y cómo operaban tan abiertamente en una importante ciudad estadounidense?
Los políticos locales como el alcalde Amezcua no pueden permitirse el silencio. Sus electores merecen más que clichés: merecen protección. Los líderes deben exigir claridad a las agencias federales, garantizar la coordinación entre las fuerzas del orden locales y federales y, sobre todo, reafirmar su compromiso con la seguridad de todos los residentes, independientemente de su estatus migratorio.
No se trata de partidismo. Se trata de la dignidad humana fundamental y la seguridad pública. Alguien pudo haber muerto ese día. El hecho de que no lo hayan hecho no es motivo de alivio; es una advertencia. No podemos permitir que nuestras calles se conviertan en campos de batalla donde figuras armadas no identificadas ejerzan un poder sin control.
Santa Ana se enorgullece de ser una comunidad diversa, vibrante e inclusiva. Esa identidad no significa nada si no nos movilizamos para proteger a los más vulnerables. Nuestros líderes deben alzar la voz, actuar y exigir responsabilidades a los responsables, antes de que ocurra una tragedia.
Basta de silencio. Basta de excusas. Es hora de un verdadero liderazgo.
Editorial: Santa Ana Mayor Valerie Amezcua’s Silence in the Face of Danger — Where Is the Leadership in Santa Ana?
A disturbing video has surfaced showing unidentified armed men, claiming to be ICE agents, pointing a gun at a person who was documenting their actions during what appeared to be an immigration arrest in Santa Ana. This is not just a violation of civil liberties—it is a dangerous escalation that puts lives at risk and erodes public trust in law enforcement.
The footage raises urgent questions: Who are these individuals? Why were they allowed to operate without clear identification or oversight? And perhaps most importantly—where were the local authorities?
In a city where the safety and rights of all residents should be paramount, the absence of a swift and forceful response from local leadership is alarming. Mayor Valerie Amezcua and other city officials have remained largely silent in the wake of this incident, despite the serious implications for community safety and accountability. The Santa Ana Police Department, which has long positioned itself as a guardian of public trust, must answer why no officers intervened or even responded to what could have been a deadly confrontation.
When armed individuals—whether federal agents or otherwise—operate in our neighborhoods with little transparency or oversight, the potential for violence increases exponentially. This is especially true when those individuals appear to act with impunity, intimidating civilians who are simply trying to observe and document lawful (or unlawful) activity. It is not only reckless; it is a threat to democracy.
While ICE does have a mandate to enforce federal immigration laws, that authority must be exercised within legal and ethical boundaries. There is no justification for brandishing a firearm at someone exercising their right to record public officials in public spaces. If these were indeed ICE agents, then the Department of Homeland Security must launch an immediate investigation. If they were not—who exactly were they? And how did they operate so openly in a major American city?
Local politicians like Mayor Amezcua cannot afford to stay silent. Their constituents deserve more than platitudes—they deserve protection. Leaders must demand clarity from federal agencies, ensure coordination between local and federal law enforcement, and above all, reaffirm their commitment to the safety of every resident, regardless of immigration status.
This is not about partisanship. This is about basic human dignity and public safety. Someone could have been killed that day. The fact that they weren’t is not a reason to breathe a sigh of relief—it’s a warning shot across the bow. We cannot allow our streets to become battlegrounds where unidentified armed figures wield unchecked power.
Santa Ana prides itself on being a diverse, vibrant, and inclusive community. That identity means nothing if we do not stand up to protect the most vulnerable among us. Our leaders must speak out, take action, and hold those responsible accountable—before tragedy strikes.
Enough silence. Enough excuses. It’s time for real leadership.
The OC Reporter 