Editorial: Federal Agencies and Private Militants Terrorize Paramount, California — Protester Run Over

Police State

Paramount, California — a working-class, predominantly immigrant city — is now the latest flashpoint in a terrifying pattern of militarized crackdowns and unchecked aggression by federal agencies and private operatives. Residents report a surge of operations involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), private contractors like Blackwater (now rebranded as Constellis), and even rogue bounty hunters acting outside of constitutional limits. These forces have descended upon the city with military-grade equipment, assault rifles, unmarked vehicles, and the blatant disregard for civil rights that has come to characterize such operations.

The most horrifying incident came during a peaceful protest earlier this week, when a protester was run over by a federal vehicle. Witnesses state that the victim — a young activist marching against ICE raids in the neighborhood — was deliberately targeted. The federal agents present refused to offer medical assistance and instead formed a perimeter to shield the vehicle and its driver from public accountability. The victim was later rushed to the hospital by fellow demonstrators. No arrests have been made. No apologies issued.

Peaceful Demonstrator was hit and killed by ICE Agents when ICE Agents ran him over with a Federal Vehicle.

What is happening in Paramount is not law enforcement. It is a campaign of fear. Residents speak of pre-dawn raids, helicopters circling above schools, families pulled from their homes without warrants, and masked operatives demanding identification with no legal basis. Community members are being surveilled, harassed, and detained — not for crimes, but for the crime of existing in a system that criminalizes immigrants, Black and Brown bodies, and anyone who dares to dissent.

The involvement of Blackwater-style contractors and bounty hunters — with their long track records of war crimes, human rights violations, and total lack of accountability — only amplifies the terror. These groups are not bound by the same protocols and oversight as public law enforcement, yet they are armed to the teeth and deployed as if the community were a battlefield.

Where is the oversight? Where are California’s state leaders, the county supervisors, the city officials? Their silence is complicity.

Paramount is not a war zone. It is a community of hard-working families, students, elders, and everyday people who deserve safety — not occupation. No federal badge or military patch gives anyone the right to terrorize civilians, run over protesters, or treat neighborhoods like enemy territory. If this happened abroad, the U.S. government would call it a human rights violation. But on American soil, under the guise of “law enforcement,” it is business as usual.

We must demand an independent investigation into these operations. We must demand the names of every agency, contractor, and officer involved. We must demand justice for the protester injured — and for every family living in fear.

This is not democracy. This is a dystopia.

The people of Paramount deserve better. The nation must pay attention.

Editorial: The Illusion of Power — How Trump, MAGA Extremists, Congress, Billionaires, and the Media Pretend to Rule Above the Constitution

The US Constitution Under Siege

In a democracy, no one is supposed to be above the law. The U.S. Constitution was crafted as a safeguard against tyranny, a living document to protect the people from unchecked power. But today, we watch as a dangerous alliance of political figures, MAGA extremists, corporate billionaires like Elon Musk, and the mainstream media operate as though that sacred document no longer applies to them.

This unholy coalition of influence—driven by ego, greed, and authoritarian ambition—has warped the public sphere into a battleground where truth is manipulated, power is hoarded, and accountability is an afterthought. Their message is loud and clear: the rules don’t apply to us.

Donald Trump and the MAGA Delusion

Donald Trump and the MAGA Delusion

At the heart of this political circus is Donald Trump, the twice-impeached current president who now seeks to reclaim the White House while facing multiple criminal indictments. Trump has spent years undermining the very Constitution he swore to uphold—attacking the free press, threatening judges, attempting to overturn elections, and inciting violence against the government. His loyal MAGA base, fueled by racism, conspiracy, and a thirst for authoritarian control, now mirrors his contempt for democratic norms.

For them, the Constitution is not a guiding principle—it’s an obstacle to their power.

Congress: Complicit by Choice

Congress: Complicit by Choice

Many members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, have stood by in silence—or worse, in support—while constitutional protections have been gutted. Rather than serve the people, they serve donors, political machines, and their own re-election campaigns. They enable corruption, ignore abuse, and pass legislation that restricts voting, criminalizes dissent, and erodes civil liberties.

This is not leadership. It’s dereliction of duty.

Elon Musk: Tech Billionaire or Unelected Kingmaker?

Elon Musk: Tech Billionaire or Unelected Kingmaker?

Elon Musk’s rise to cultural and economic power has been accompanied by a growing belief that wealth equals authority. Whether it’s through manipulating markets, playing games with global communications platforms, or cozying up to authoritarian regimes, Musk acts like a sovereign operating above regulation. He exploits loopholes, silences critics, and positions himself as an untouchable visionary—while simultaneously dodging accountability and trampling the very institutions that keep democracy alive.

The Mainstream Media: Gatekeepers Turned Enablers

The Mainstream Media: Gatekeepers Turned Enablers

The mainstream media, once the watchdog of democracy, is now deeply entangled in this toxic web. Many outlets prioritize access over truth, spectacle over substance, ratings over responsibility. They amplify lies, normalize fascism, and treat insurrection as “controversy.” Rather than challenge power, they package and sell it. Rather than confront injustice, they report around it—leaving the public confused, misinformed, and divided.

Media should serve the people, not the powerful.

This Is Not Just Corruption. It’s Constitutional Collapse.

This Is Not Just Corruption. It’s Constitutional Collapse.

Together, these forces—Trump’s fascist ambitions, MAGA’s rage, Congress’s cowardice, Musk’s billionaire arrogance, and the media’s complicity—are leading us toward a post-Constitutional America. They believe they own the world. That their wealth, their influence, and their platforms place them above the law, above ethics, above the people.

But they are wrong.

We must reject this illusion of untouchable power. We must remind every politician, billionaire, and media mogul that the Constitution does not belong to them—it belongs to us. And if we don’t stand up now to reclaim it, we may lose the last threads of democracy holding this country together.

Power without accountability is tyranny. And tyranny has no place in a free society.

— Editorial Board

Editorial: America Under Siege — How President Donald Trump’s Racist Agenda Has Turned the Government Against Its Own People

Trump’s Racist Agenda

The United States is facing a constitutional crisis unlike anything seen in modern history. Under the current presidency of Donald Trump, an authoritarian and racist agenda has taken hold, turning government institutions and private interests into tools of persecution. This is not speculation. This is the lived experience of countless U.S. citizens and minorities who find themselves targeted, harassed, and violated by the very structures meant to protect them.

ICE agents, bounty hunters, ATF operatives, FBI surveillance teams, the U.S. military, and agents of the Department of Homeland Security are being unleashed on American soil—not to serve justice, but to silence dissent, terrorize communities of color, and enforce a white nationalist vision of the nation. And they are not acting alone.

State, county, and city governments—many of them aligned with Trump’s extremist agenda—are enablers in this campaign. From local police departments collaborating with federal raids, to state legislatures passing laws criminalizing protest, every level of government has been bent toward repression. Add to this the involvement of corporate profiteers like Halliburton—whose contracts enable mass surveillance, detention, and militarization—and we are no longer talking about rogue elements. We are talking about a full-fledged system of control.

This is not security. This is persecution.

Immigrant families are torn apart in pre-dawn raids. Black and Brown neighborhoods are over-policed, surveilled, and criminalized. Protesters are tear-gassed, beaten, and jailed for exercising their First Amendment rights. Entire communities live under a constant threat of state violence, and the Constitution’s promises of due process, equal protection, and freedom from unlawful search and seizure are trampled daily.

The current administration’s fingerprints are all over this. Trump has openly celebrated law enforcement brutality, labeled political opponents as enemies, and stoked racial division at every turn. His agenda is not hidden—it is shouted from podiums, etched into executive orders, and enforced by the barrel of a gun.

Militarized ATF

This is how democracy dies—not all at once, but under the slow crush of sanctioned injustice.

What we are witnessing is not simply a failure of policy. It is a deliberate effort to turn the United States into a police state that serves the interests of the few, at the expense of the many. It is the transformation of the federal government into a tool for racial dominance, using fear and violence to suppress resistance.

It is unconstitutional. It is immoral. And it must be stopped.

Unlawful Raids, Racist Agenda, Civil Rights Violations

We must name it for what it is: State-sponsored oppression.

Now is not the time for silence or neutrality. Now is the time to resist—legally, politically, and morally. We must demand accountability from every agency, every politician, and every corporation complicit in this violence. We must protect and elevate the voices of the targeted. And we must fight to restore the Constitution to its rightful place as a shield for the people—not a weapon for the powerful.

History is watching. Future generations will ask what we did when democracy was under attack from within. Let the answer be that we stood up.

Editorial Board

Editorial: The Trump Administration’s Racist Policies in America.

The US President

The Trump administration signaled a hazardous intensification of institutional racism and xenophobia in the United States. The Trump administration turned immigration enforcement into a weapon of fear and control, disproportionately targeting immigrant, brown, and Black communities through policies such as the “Muslim Ban,” the separation of families at the border, and the aggressive increase in ICE raids.

This period has been characterized by illegal ICE raids, which frequently involve breaches of fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution, notably the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, and are frequently conducted without warrants or due process. These raids not only tear apart families, but also convey a terrifying signal that some groups of people, particularly Latinos, Muslims, and undocumented immigrants, are less deserving of respect or safety.

Illegal ICE Raids

Simultaneously, white supremacist language has been encouraged rather than denounced. In response to the Charlottesville march, Trump infamously said there were “very fine people on both sides,” and the administration refused to take a strong stance against violent hate groups, which revived formerly marginalized racist ideas.

All of this is completely at odds with the values that the Constitution professes to support. The Founders cautioned about tyranny, but under Trump, we see a government engaging in tyranny from within, using the machinery of state authority to infringe on the rights of the most vulnerable while protecting the powerful.

Orange County CA Lake Forrest Man Eric Walter Ramminger Arrested for hate crimes, racial slurs, Assault, death threats against a business owner.

The purpose of the Constitution is to be a living document—a protection for everyone, not a selective instrument used to support privilege while stifling dissent. Now more than ever, it is crucial to demand responsibility, defend human rights, and advocate for a real democracy where liberty and justice are assured for everyone, not just a select few.

Editorial: The Broken Promise of Sanctuary: ICE Raids in Santa Ana Expose Leadership Failures


In recent weeks, the city of Santa Ana, California—self-identified as a sanctuary for undocumented immigrants—has been thrust into national attention following a series of aggressive Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids that have left its predominantly Latino community in distress. These operations serve as a stark reminder of how tenuous the notion of “sanctuary” is when local leadership fails to uphold its commitments. At the core of this controversy is Mayor Valerie Amezcua, whose tenure has increasingly come under scrutiny as her administration seems ill-equipped—or perhaps unwilling—to protect residents from federal encroachment.


Santa Ana, similar to many cities throughout the United States, adopted sanctuary policies with the aim of fostering trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement. The premise was straightforward yet powerful: local police would not cooperate with federal immigration authorities unless absolutely necessary, ensuring that all residents could feel secure in reporting crimes or seeking assistance without the dread of deportation. For years, these measures have acted as a lifeline for thousands of families who consider Santa Ana their home. However, now faced with an intensifying crackdown by ICE, the facade of protection offered by these policies appears to be fraying—and one cannot help but question whether Mayor Amezcua holds some responsibility for the turmoil unfolding before us.

A Crisis Unfolding

The recent surge of ICE arrests in Santa Ana has sent shockwaves through neighborhoods already contending with economic difficulties and systemic inequality. Families have been shattered, children left without parents, and businesses disrupted as workers disappear overnight. Community leaders report widespread anxiety among residents, who are now uncertain about where they can turn for safety. This climate of fear is precisely what sanctuary policies were intended to avert—but instead, it appears the city’s leaders have permitted ICE agents to disrupt lives with impunity.


What renders this situation particularly outrageous is the fact that Santa Ana’s population is predominantly Latino, with nearly three-quarters of its residents identifying as Hispanic or Latinx. Many of these individuals arrived in the United States in search of improved opportunities for themselves and their families, contributing significantly to the cultural and economic fabric of the city. Yet rather than standing firmly with them during this crisis, Mayor Amezcua has seemed absent at best—and complicit at worst.

Leadership on Trial

Since assuming office, Mayor Amezcua has faced challenges in exhibiting effective leadership, often criticized for favoring optics over substantive action. Her response to the current ICE raids has done little to alleviate those apprehensions. While other mayors of sanctuary cities have publicly denounced such actions and worked diligently to protect their constituents, Amezcua has conspicuously maintained her silence. When pressed for clarification, she provides vague assurances about “working within legal frameworks” but refrains from committing to tangible measures that might genuinely protect vulnerable residents.
This absence of decisive action prompts significant inquiries regarding her dedication to the very constituents she vowed to serve. How can a mayor assert her representation of a community when she declines to confront forces that threaten its very survival? In moments of crisis, authentic leadership necessitates boldness—not timidity. It mandates heeding the voices of those most impacted and undertaking substantive measures to fulfill their needs. Regrettably, Mayor Amezcua’s history implies she possesses neither the courage nor the vision to meet the chall

A Call to Action

The struggles of Santa Ana’s immigrant community should act as a clarion call, not only for Mayor Amezcua but also for every elected official in municipalities across the nation. Sanctuary policies are of no consequence if they cannot be enforced effectively—and such enforcement commences with robust, principled leadership ready to oppose injustice. Local administrations must investigate every potential avenue to resist federal overreach, ranging from legal disputes to grassroots initiatives aimed at empowering marginalized populations.

Furthermore, residents are urged to hold their leaders accountable. If Mayor Amezcua is unable to fulfill the promise of sanctuary, then it may be time for another individual to rise to the occasion—someone who comprehends the stakes involved and possesses the moral clarity required to uphold human dignity above all else.

Conclusion

Santa Ana stands at a pivotal juncture, torn between the ideals it previously embraced and the harsh realities of existence under an increasingly antagonistic federal administration. For an extended period, the city’s leaders have depended on vacuous rhetoric while neglecting to enforce meaningful protections for their most vulnerable residents. As ICE persistently targets Latino families in Santa Ana, one irrefutable truth emerges: the era of empty gestures has concluded. Genuine transformation will necessitate authentic leadership—and until Mayor Amezcua demonstrates her ability to provide such leadership, the residents of Santa Ana merit superior representation.

La alcaldesa de Santa Ana, Valerie Amezcua, podría colaborar con el Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) en la implementación de estas directivas federales

Foto de: Igmar Rodas / The Orange County Reporter

En los últimos días, Santa Ana, una ciudad ubicada en el condado de Orange, California, ha vivido extensas protestas pacíficas. Estas manifestaciones han sido impulsadas principalmente por la gran comunidad latina de la ciudad, que ha expresado una gran preocupación por múltiples cuestiones interconectadas.

Un tema clave en juego son las recientes políticas migratorias del presidente Donald Trump, especialmente sus propuestas de deportaciones masivas de inmigrantes indocumentados, incluidos aquellos sin antecedentes penales que se desempeñan como miembros diligentes y contribuyentes de la sociedad. El plan del gobierno de invocar la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros de 1798 para acelerar las deportaciones ha intensificado estas preocupaciones.

Foto de: Igmar Rodas / The Orange County Reporter

Para agravar aún más el malestar local, hay informes que indican que la alcaldesa de Santa Ana, Valerie Amezcua, podría estar coordinando con el Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) para ejecutar estas órdenes federales. Muchos perciben esta supuesta colaboración como una violación de la ley de ciudades santuario de Santa Ana de 2017, que se promulgó para proteger a las personas indocumentadas de las acciones federales de inmigración.

Las protestas se han caracterizado por su enfoque no violento, con manifestantes que abogan por la protección de los derechos de los inmigrantes y el cumplimiento de la ordenanza de ciudad santuario. Los líderes comunitarios y los defensores están promoviendo políticas que reconocen el papel de los inmigrantes indocumentados y buscan una reforma migratoria integral en lugar de acciones punitivas.

Foto de: Igmar Rodas / The Orange County Reporter

Estos sucesos en Santa Ana reflejan una conversación nacional más amplia sobre las políticas de inmigración y la participación de los gobiernos locales en su aplicación. A medida que la situación evoluciona, pone de relieve la discordia entre los mandatos federales y los principios comunitarios, en particular en áreas con grandes poblaciones de inmigrantes.

Santa Ana Mayor Valerie Amezcua may be collaborating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the implementation of these federal directives

Photo by: Igmar Rodas / The Orange County Reporter

In recent days, Santa Ana, a city located in Orange County, California, has experienced extensive peaceful protests. These demonstrations have been mainly fueled by the city’s large Latino community, voicing significant concern over multiple interconnected issues.


A key issue at stake is President Donald Trump’s recent immigration policies, especially his proposals for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, including those without criminal histories who serve as diligent, tax-paying members of society. The administration’s plan to invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to accelerate deportations has intensified these worries.

Photo by: Igmar Rodas / The Orange County Reporter


Further aggravating local unrest are reports indicating that Santa Ana Mayor Valerie Amezcua may be coordinating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to carry out these federal orders. Many perceive this alleged collaboration as a breach of Santa Ana’s 2017 sanctuary city law, which was enacted to safeguard undocumented individuals from federal immigration actions.


The protests have been characterized by their non-violent approach, with demonstrators advocating for the safeguarding of immigrant rights and compliance with the sanctuary city ordinance. Community leaders and advocates are promoting policies that acknowledge the roles of undocumented immigrants and pursue comprehensive immigration reform rather than punitive actions.

Photo by: Igmar Rodas / The Orange County Reporter


These occurrences in Santa Ana mirror a wider national conversation regarding immigration policies and the involvement of local governments in enforcing them. As the situation evolves, it highlights the discord between federal mandates and community principles, particularly in areas with large immigrant populations.